Chandler v. Aldridge
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Linwood Earl- Chandler appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action for failure to return the consent form permitting withdrawal from his prison account and the affidavit showing that he exhausted administrative remedies. Because Chandler may refile his suit and either pay the required fee or consent to withdrawal in installments and file the affidavit, the dismissal order is interlocutory and not appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
559 F. App'x 215 (Chandler v. Aldridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.