Chander v. Barry

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: May 27, 2003
• Docket: 02-1554
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1554

DATUK RAMESH CHANDER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STAN G. BARRY, Sheriff, Fairfax County,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-01-1333)

Submitted: May 13, 2003 Decided: May 27, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hunter C. Harrison, Jr., McLean, Virginia, for Appellant. James R. Parrish, BRANDT, JENNINGS, SNEE, DUPRAY & PARRISH, P.L.L.C., Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Datuk Ramesh Chander appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to Defendant on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Chander v. Barry, No. CA-01-1333 (E.D. Va.

Apr. 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED