Chander v. Barry

Fourth Circuit

Chander v. Barry

63 F. App'x 735

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 27, 2003·No. No. 02-1554·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Datuk Ramesh Chander appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 [736] (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Chander v. Barry, No. CA-01-1333 (E.D.Va. Apr. 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Datuk Ramesh Chander appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 [736] (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Chander v. Barry, No. CA-01-1333 (E.D.Va. Apr. 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Chander v. Barry, 63 F. App'x 735 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

63 F. App'x 735 (Chander v. Barry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related