Chancy v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Chancy v. United States

199 F. App'x 259

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 7, 2006·No. No. 06-6704·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Carlton L. Chaney, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chaney v. United States, No. 7:06-cv-00120-jlk (W.D.Va. Mar. 8, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court [260]*260and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Carlton L. Chaney, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chaney v. United States, No. 7:06-cv-00120-jlk (W.D.Va. Mar. 8, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court [260]*260and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Chancy v. United States, 199 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

199 F. App'x 259 (Chancy v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related