Chancy v. N.C. Department of Correction
This text of Chancy v. N.C. Department of Correction (Chancy v. N.C. Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The undersigned have reviewed the record and the prior Order filed by Deputy Commissioner Berger. The appealing party has not shown good ground to receive further evidence or amend the Order.
2. Prior to the hearing in this matter, plaintiff confirmed in open court that he was prepared to offer no expert medical testimony.
2. A plaintiff may not recover in a medical malpractice claim against a medical professional, including a nurse, if that plaintiff cannot show the standard of medical care owed and that the standard was not met. N.C. Gen. Stat.
3. Without expert medical testimony, plaintiffs case must fail.
2. Each side shall bear its own costs.
This is the ___ day of March, 2001.
S/_______________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
S/______________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER
S/___________________ BERNADINE S. BALLANCE COMMISSIONER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chancy v. N.C. Department of Correction, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chancy-v-nc-department-of-correction-ncworkcompcom-2001.