Chancey v. State
90 S.W. 632, 48 Tex. Crim. 535, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 256
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 18, 1905
DocketNo. 3150.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 90 S.W. 632 (Chancey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chancey v. State, 90 S.W. 632, 48 Tex. Crim. 535, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 256 (Tex. 1905).
Opinions
The Assistant Attorney-General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the recognizance does not state the amount of the punishment assessed against appellant, as required by article 887, Code Criminal Procedure. An examination of the record, shows that the motion is well taken. May v. State, 40 Tex.Crim. Rep.. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Haverbekken v. State
200 S.W. 524 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1918)
Nelson v. State
119 S.W. 846 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1909)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
90 S.W. 632, 48 Tex. Crim. 535, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chancey-v-state-texcrimapp-1905.