Chancey v. State
90 S.W. 632, 48 Tex. Crim. 535, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 256
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 18, 1905·No. No. 3150.·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinions
The Assistant Attorney-General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the recognizance does not state the amount of the punishment assessed against appellant, as required by article 887, Code Criminal Procedure. An examination of the record, shows that the motion is well taken. May v. State, 40 Tex.Crim. Rep.. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chancey v. State, 90 S.W. 632, 48 Tex. Crim. 535, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 256 (Tex. 1905).
90 S.W. 632 (Chancey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Haverbekken v. State
200 S.W. 524 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1918)
Nelson v. State
119 S.W. 846 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1909)