Chancey v. State of Florida
This text of Chancey v. State of Florida (Chancey v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2023-2125 _____________________________
CHRISTOPHER CHANCEY,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel—Original Jurisdiction.
May 16, 2024
PER CURIAM.
The Court denies the petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel on the merits.
LEWIS, M.K. THOMAS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Christopher Chancey, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chancey v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chancey-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.