Chancey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Chancey v. State

245 S.E.2d 470, 146 Ga. App. 20, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2271

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 12, 1978·No. 55638·Published

Opinion

Per curiam.

Defendant was convicted of distributing obscene materials in violation of Code § 26-2101. Held:

Defendant’s enumerations of error raise the same issues which have been considered and rejected in Sewell v. State, 238 Ga. 495 (2, 4) (233 SE2d 187), and Pierce v. State, 239 Ga. 844 (239 SE2d 28), and no further consideration is required.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., Shulman and Birdsong, JJ., concur. Glenn Zell, for appellant. Hinson McAuliffe, Solicitor, Leonard W. Rhodes, Assistant Solicitor, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

Defendant was convicted of distributing obscene materials in violation of Code § 26-2101. Held:

Defendant’s enumerations of error raise the same issues which have been considered and rejected in Sewell v. State, 238 Ga. 495 (2, 4) (233 SE2d 187), and Pierce v. State, 239 Ga. 844 (239 SE2d 28), and no further consideration is required.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., Shulman and Birdsong, JJ., concur. Glenn Zell, for appellant. Hinson McAuliffe, Solicitor, Leonard W. Rhodes, Assistant Solicitor, for appellee.

Chancey v. State, 245 S.E.2d 470, 146 Ga. App. 20, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2271 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

245 S.E.2d 470 (Chancey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related