Chancellor of New Jersey v. Hoxsey
This text of 41 N.J.L. 217 (Chancellor of New Jersey v. Hoxsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This suit has been brought by the Chancellor in his official name, on a money bond, and the demurrer that has been put in to the declaration is intended to raise the question whether he has a legal right to sue in this mode. It is argued that the Chancellor is not a corporation, and that, consequently, he must sue in his personal capacity and not in his official character.
A very slight examination of the authorities would have manifested that this objection is without foundation either in principle or authority. Grant on Corporations 651, says that some of the officers of the crown, such as the Lord Chancellor, the Lord High Treasurer, and the Chief Justices, are, for certain purposes, in the nature of corporations sole. See, also, Skrogges v. Coleshil, Dyer 175, and 2 Inst. 210.
In this state it has always been the practice for the Chancellor to proceed in the present form, and the point raised is res adjudícala. Halsted, Ordinary, v. Fowler, 2 Zab. 48.
Let judgment be entered for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 N.J.L. 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chancellor-of-new-jersey-v-hoxsey-nj-1879.