Chance Wade Walker v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 9, 2014
Docket02-13-00027-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Chance Wade Walker v. State (Chance Wade Walker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chance Wade Walker v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00027-CR

CHANCE WADE WALKER APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 43RD DISTRICT COURT OF PARKER COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

A jury convicted Appellant Chance Wade Walker of third-degree felony

driving while intoxicated. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 49.04(a), 49.09(b)(2)

(West Supp. 2013). The jury assessed his punishment at four years’

imprisonment and a fine of $12.00, and the trial court sentenced him accordingly.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Walker’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw

as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. Counsel’s brief and motion meet

the requirements of Anders v. California2 by presenting a professional evaluation

of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. This

court afforded Walker the opportunity to file a brief on his own behalf, but he did

not do so.

As the reviewing court, we must conduct an independent evaluation of the

record to determine whether counsel is correct in determining that the appeal is

frivolous. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991);

Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 923 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Only

then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree with

counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in

the record that arguably might support an appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178

S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT, J.

2 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).

2 DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: January 9, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Mays v. State
904 S.W.2d 920 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Stafford v. State
813 S.W.2d 503 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Bledsoe v. State
178 S.W.3d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Chance Wade Walker v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chance-wade-walker-v-state-texapp-2014.