Chance v. State
This text of 23 S.E. 832 (Chance v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The rules of the superior court being applicable in city courts established under the act of October 19, 1891, which was amended by the act of December 23,1892, it was error, upon the trial of a misdemeanor in the city court of Carroll. county, for the presiding judge to refuse to allow counsel for the accused one hour in which to argue the case to the jury, such counsel having fully complied with the requirements of rule six in asking for the additional time desired.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 S.E. 832, 97 Ga. 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chance-v-state-ga-1895.