Chance Dewayne Grantham v. the State of Texas
This text of Chance Dewayne Grantham v. the State of Texas (Chance Dewayne Grantham v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
CHANCE DEWAYNE GRANTHAM, § No. 08-24-00103-CR
Appellant, § Appeal from the
v. § 33rd/424th District Court
THE STATE OF TEXAS, § of Llano County, Texas
Appellee. § (TC# CR8664)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Chance Dewayne Grantham, filed a notice of appeal for a judgment of
conviction on charges of bail jumping and failure to appear. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 38.10(f).
We dismiss the appeal because the trial court certified that Appellant has waived the right of
appeal.
Rule 25.2(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure requires that the trial court enter
its certification of a defendant’s right of appeal each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other
appealable order. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record in this cause contained two
certificates of the defendant’s right of appeal. The first certification, signed by the trial court on
April 1, 2024, states that the case “[i]s not a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has the right to appeal.” The second certification, signed April 4, 2024, states that defendant “has waived the right
of appeal.”
On April 26, 2024, this Court sent notice to the parties that the clerk’s record included a
certification stating that Appellant had waived the right of appeal. Our notice requested that
Appellant’s counsel submit a short letter brief to address whether Appellant had the right of appeal
in this case. Counsel for Appellant did not respond.
On May 14, 2024, court reporter Jennifer Fest filed a notice of no record, stating: “The
defendant has waived his right to appeal regarding this matter when he subsequently entered pleas
to other pending cases; therefore, unless directed otherwise, no Reporter’s Record will be
submitted.” That same day, this Court issued an abatement order directing the trial court to correct
the conflicting certifications in the record. The supplemental clerk’s record filed pursuant to our
abatement order contains a new certification of the defendant’s right of appeal signed by the trial
court on May 20, 2024. The certification states that defendant has waived the right of appeal,
affirming the April 4, 2024 certification, and is signed by the trial court. Appellant and Appellant’s
counsel have not signed the most recent May 20, 2024 certification, but their signatures appear on
the April 4, 2024 certification.
The record before us consists only of a clerk’s record. Tex. R. App. P. 34.1 (stating that
the appellate record consists of the clerk’s record and “if necessary to the appeal,” the reporter’s
record). There is no indication that Appellant has attempted to file a reporter’s record, even after
Ms. Fest’s notice that she would not be filing the record unless directed otherwise. Further,
Appellant has not filed a brief raising any issues presented in the clerk’s record, which would have
been due 30 days after the clerk’s record was filed on April 24, 2024. Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a)
2 (stating that an appellant must file a brief within 30 days of the latter of the date the clerk’s record
or reporter’s record was filed).
Because the record before us does not contain a certification that Appellant has the right of
appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d) (requiring a
certification of the defendant’s right of appeal).
This Court further ORDERS Appellant’s attorney, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate
Procedure 48.4, to send Appellant a copy of this opinion and this Court’s judgment, to notify
Appellant of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review, and to inform Appellant of
the applicable deadlines. Tex. R. App. P. 48.4; 68. Appellant’s attorney is further ORDERED to
comply with all requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 48.4.
JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice
July 22, 2024
Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
(Do Not Publish)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chance Dewayne Grantham v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chance-dewayne-grantham-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.