Chance Dewayne Grantham v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 22, 2024
Docket08-24-00103-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Chance Dewayne Grantham v. the State of Texas (Chance Dewayne Grantham v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chance Dewayne Grantham v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

CHANCE DEWAYNE GRANTHAM, § No. 08-24-00103-CR

Appellant, § Appeal from the

v. § 33rd/424th District Court

THE STATE OF TEXAS, § of Llano County, Texas

Appellee. § (TC# CR8664)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Chance Dewayne Grantham, filed a notice of appeal for a judgment of

conviction on charges of bail jumping and failure to appear. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 38.10(f).

We dismiss the appeal because the trial court certified that Appellant has waived the right of

appeal.

Rule 25.2(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure requires that the trial court enter

its certification of a defendant’s right of appeal each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other

appealable order. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record in this cause contained two

certificates of the defendant’s right of appeal. The first certification, signed by the trial court on

April 1, 2024, states that the case “[i]s not a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has the right to appeal.” The second certification, signed April 4, 2024, states that defendant “has waived the right

of appeal.”

On April 26, 2024, this Court sent notice to the parties that the clerk’s record included a

certification stating that Appellant had waived the right of appeal. Our notice requested that

Appellant’s counsel submit a short letter brief to address whether Appellant had the right of appeal

in this case. Counsel for Appellant did not respond.

On May 14, 2024, court reporter Jennifer Fest filed a notice of no record, stating: “The

defendant has waived his right to appeal regarding this matter when he subsequently entered pleas

to other pending cases; therefore, unless directed otherwise, no Reporter’s Record will be

submitted.” That same day, this Court issued an abatement order directing the trial court to correct

the conflicting certifications in the record. The supplemental clerk’s record filed pursuant to our

abatement order contains a new certification of the defendant’s right of appeal signed by the trial

court on May 20, 2024. The certification states that defendant has waived the right of appeal,

affirming the April 4, 2024 certification, and is signed by the trial court. Appellant and Appellant’s

counsel have not signed the most recent May 20, 2024 certification, but their signatures appear on

the April 4, 2024 certification.

The record before us consists only of a clerk’s record. Tex. R. App. P. 34.1 (stating that

the appellate record consists of the clerk’s record and “if necessary to the appeal,” the reporter’s

record). There is no indication that Appellant has attempted to file a reporter’s record, even after

Ms. Fest’s notice that she would not be filing the record unless directed otherwise. Further,

Appellant has not filed a brief raising any issues presented in the clerk’s record, which would have

been due 30 days after the clerk’s record was filed on April 24, 2024. Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a)

2 (stating that an appellant must file a brief within 30 days of the latter of the date the clerk’s record

or reporter’s record was filed).

Because the record before us does not contain a certification that Appellant has the right of

appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d) (requiring a

certification of the defendant’s right of appeal).

This Court further ORDERS Appellant’s attorney, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 48.4, to send Appellant a copy of this opinion and this Court’s judgment, to notify

Appellant of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review, and to inform Appellant of

the applicable deadlines. Tex. R. App. P. 48.4; 68. Appellant’s attorney is further ORDERED to

comply with all requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 48.4.

JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice

July 22, 2024

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 38.10
Texas PE § 38.10(f)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Chance Dewayne Grantham v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chance-dewayne-grantham-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.