Chanady v. Detroit Sheet Metal Works

Sixth Circuit

Chanady v. Detroit Sheet Metal Works

158 F.2d 799, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2472

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 5, 1946·No. No. 10285·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action having been heard upon the record, oral arguments of counsel and briefs of the respective parties; and it appearing that the findings of fact of the-District Judge, 64 F.Supp. 580, are fully supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and that his conclusions, of law are correct; it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is. hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This action having been heard upon the record, oral arguments of counsel and briefs of the respective parties; and it appearing that the findings of fact of the-District Judge, 64 F.Supp. 580, are fully supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and that his conclusions, of law are correct; it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is. hereby affirmed.

Chanady v. Detroit Sheet Metal Works, 158 F.2d 799, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2472 (6th Cir. 1946).

Pincite

158 F.2d 799 (Chanady v. Detroit Sheet Metal Works) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related