Chanady v. Detroit Sheet Metal Works

Sixth Circuit

Chanady v. Detroit Sheet Metal Works

158 F.2d 799, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2472

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 5, 1946

DocketNo. 10285

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 158 F.2d 799 (Chanady v. Detroit Sheet Metal Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chanady v. Detroit Sheet Metal Works, 158 F.2d 799, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2472 (6th Cir. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action having been heard upon the record, oral arguments of counsel and briefs of the respective parties; and it appearing that the findings of fact of the-District Judge, 64 F.Supp. 580, are fully supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and that his conclusions, of law are correct; it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is. hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This action having been heard upon the record, oral arguments of counsel and briefs of the respective parties; and it appearing that the findings of fact of the-District Judge, 64 F.Supp. 580, are fully supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and that his conclusions, of law are correct; it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is. hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 F.2d 799, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chanady-v-detroit-sheet-metal-works-ca6-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack