Chan v. 1058 Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chan v. 1058 Corp.

200 A.D.2d 434, 607 N.Y.S.2d 246

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 13, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 200 A.D.2d 434 (Chan v. 1058 Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chan v. 1058 Corp., 200 A.D.2d 434, 607 N.Y.S.2d 246 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.), entered on or about November 17, 1992, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability and directed an immediate trial on the issue of damages, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs, proprietary lessees in a building owned and managed by defendants-appellants and third-party plaintiffs, were properly awarded summary judgment on liability against defendants-appellants in this action for damages arising from water leakage into their apartment. The proprietary lease required appellant building owner to maintain in good repair the walls of the premises. A report by a consulting engineer, retained by appellant managing agent on behalf of appellant building owner to investigate the incident, attributed the source of the leakage to openings in the coping stones of the parapet wall, openings in the masonry wall and defects in the terrace waterproofing.

In light of this proof, and appellants’ conclusory, immaterial allegations that questions of fact exist concerning the potential liability of a co-defendant contractor and third-party defendant architect who were involved in renovation and [435]*435brick work repair of the premises several years before this incident, partial summary judgment on the issue of liability was proper (see, Dillenberger v 74 Fifth Ave. Owners Corp., 155 AD2d 327). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.), entered on or about November 17, 1992, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability and directed an immediate trial on the issue of damages, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs, proprietary lessees in a building owned and managed by defendants-appellants and third-party plaintiffs, were properly awarded summary judgment on liability against defendants-appellants in this action for damages arising from water leakage into their apartment. The proprietary lease required appellant building owner to maintain in good repair the walls of the premises. A report by a consulting engineer, retained by appellant managing agent on behalf of appellant building owner to investigate the incident, attributed the source of the leakage to openings in the coping stones of the parapet wall, openings in the masonry wall and defects in the terrace waterproofing.

In light of this proof, and appellants’ conclusory, immaterial allegations that questions of fact exist concerning the potential liability of a co-defendant contractor and third-party defendant architect who were involved in renovation and [435]*435brick work repair of the premises several years before this incident, partial summary judgment on the issue of liability was proper (see, Dillenberger v 74 Fifth Ave. Owners Corp., 155 AD2d 327). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 A.D.2d 434, 607 N.Y.S.2d 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chan-v-1058-corp-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack