Chan Ngun Yuk v. White

228 F. 1019, 142 C.C.A. 665, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2412
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 10, 1916
DocketNos. 2706, 2701, 2694, 2700, 2707
StatusPublished

This text of 228 F. 1019 (Chan Ngun Yuk v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chan Ngun Yuk v. White, 228 F. 1019, 142 C.C.A. 665, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2412 (9th Cir. 1916).

Opinion

Appeals from [1020]*1020the District Court of the United States for the First Division of the Northern District of California.

Jno. W. Preston, U. S. Atty., and Casper A. Ornbaum, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

On motion of counsel for appellees, appeals dismissed for the noncompliance by the appel-. lants with the provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the Rules of Practice of this court (the, appellant in each ease having failed to file a record thereof and to docket the case by or before the return day required by' said rule).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 F. 1019, 142 C.C.A. 665, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chan-ngun-yuk-v-white-ca9-1916.