Chan Ngun Yuk v. White

Ninth Circuit

Chan Ngun Yuk v. White

228 F. 1019, 142 C.C.A. 665, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2412

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 10, 1916·No. Nos. 2706, 2701, 2694, 2700, 2707·Published

Opinion

Appeals from [1020]*1020the District Court of the United States for the First Division of the Northern District of California.

Jno. W. Preston, U. S. Atty., and Casper A. Ornbaum, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

On motion of counsel for appellees, appeals dismissed for the noncompliance by the appel-. lants with the provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the Rules of Practice of this court (the, appellant in each ease having failed to file a record thereof and to docket the case by or before the return day required by' said rule).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from [1020]*1020the District Court of the United States for the First Division of the Northern District of California.

Jno. W. Preston, U. S. Atty., and Casper A. Ornbaum, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

On motion of counsel for appellees, appeals dismissed for the noncompliance by the appel-. lants with the provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the Rules of Practice of this court (the, appellant in each ease having failed to file a record thereof and to docket the case by or before the return day required by' said rule).

Chan Ngun Yuk v. White, 228 F. 1019, 142 C.C.A. 665, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2412 (9th Cir. 1916).

Pincite

228 F. 1019 (Chan Ngun Yuk v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.