Chan Il Pak v. Ad Villarai, LLC, the Ashley Nicole Williams Trust, Villas on Raiford, LLC, and Villas on Raiford Carrollton Senior Housing, LLC.
Opinion
ACCEPTED
05-14-01312-CV
FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS
DALLAS, TEXAS 6/7/2018 12:16 PM
LISA MATZ
CLERK
No. 05-14-01312-CV
FILED IN
In the 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS
COURT OF APPEALS 6/7/2018 12:16:43 PM FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS LISA MATZ DALLAS, TEXAS Clerk
Chan IL Pak Appellant
V.
AD Villarai, LLC, The Ashley Nicole Williams Trust, and Villas on Raiford Carrollton Senior Housing, LLC.
Appellees
On Appeal from the
101st Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas.
APPELLEE'S STATEMENT OF RULE 49.2 OPTION
Appellees and Cross-Appellants AD Villarai, L.L.C., The Ashley Nicole
Williams Trust, and Villas on Raiford Carrollton Senior Housing, L.L.C. ("Villas"),
following Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 49.2, hereby exercise their option not
to file a full response, unless the Court so requests.
This option is exercised because the Appellant's Motion for Rehearing, filed
June 5, 2018, raises no new arguments. Specifically, Mr. Pak again repeats his
STATEMENT OF RULE 49.2 OPTION Page 1 of 4 argument that no corporate action can ever be taken against him by Villas, unless he
consents to that action, despite the unopposed findings that he has committed a prior
material breach of the Villas Company Agreement 1 and that violating members can
be removed from Villas based upon the vote of the "remaining members" 2 meaning
the members other than Mr. Pak. These arguments have already been raised and
addressed by the parties and by the Court. For example, see Mr. Pak's argument I.
in his Appellant's Brief: "This court cannot interpret the company agreements to
exclude any requirements that Chan Pak consent to his own expulsion." Chan Pak' s
Amended Appellant Brief, December 1, 201 7, at p. 66. A large portion of the Motion
for Rehearing again addresses that Article 5.11 of the Company Agreement and
Texas Business and Commerce Code Section 101.359, allowing corporate entities
to function by signed written consents, are somehow inapplicable here. (Motion for
Rehearing pp. 16-24.) The same arguments were presented in the Amended
Appellant's Brief of December 1, 2017 at pages 61-64.
The Motion for Rehearing also fails to clearly identify any new or different
argument or any specific aspect of the Court's Judgment and Opinion which is being
challenged. It has failed to meet the standards that a motion for rehearing "must
clearly state the points relied on for the rehearing." Tex. App. Proc. Rule 49.1.
1 Conclusion of Law 5 2 Pltfs' Tr. Exs. 2 and 8, each at Article 8.6(e), and Findings of Fact 12 and 63.
STATEMENT OF RULE 49.2 OPTION Page 2 of 4 G:\Q\AN23-4 Anderson -Chan Lawsuit\Appeal 14-01312\DRAFTS\Response 06-06-18. docx
Appellees pray that the motion for rehearing be denied without requiring
further response. In the alternative, Appellees pray that this Court advise Appellees
to file a full response to the motion for rehearing, and for such other and further relief
to which Appellees show themselves justly entitled.
Respectfully submitted,
By: William F. LePage
William F. LePage State Bar No. 12216800 Peter C. D' Apice State Bar No. 05377783
STUTZMAN, BROMBERG, ESSERMAN & PLIFKA, P.C. 2323 Bryan Street, Suite 2200 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 969-4900 Telecopy: (214) 969-4999 lepage@s bep-law. com
COUNSEL FOR CROSS APPELLANTS AND APPELLEES AD VILLARAI, LLC, THE ASHLEY NICOLE WILLIAMS TRUST AND VILLAS ON RAIFORD CARROLLTON SENIOR HOUSING, LLC
Co-counsel: David M. Pruessner State Bar No. 16364500 Law Offices of David M. Pruessner 4111 Joshua Lane Dallas, Texas 75287 (214) 543-6827 Fax: (972) 716-1899
STATEMENT OF RULE 49.2 OPTION Page 3 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify a true and correct copy of the above response has been served
electronically through the State's electronic manager to Chan Pak on this the 7th day
of June, 2018.
Isl William F. LePage William F. LePage
STATEMENT OF RULE 49.2 OPTION Page 4 of 4
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chan Il Pak v. Ad Villarai, LLC, the Ashley Nicole Williams Trust, Villas on Raiford, LLC, and Villas on Raiford Carrollton Senior Housing, LLC. (Chan Il Pak v. Ad Villarai, LLC, the Ashley Nicole Williams Trust, Villas on Raiford, LLC, and Villas on Raiford Carrollton Senior Housing, LLC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.