Chan Hi v. Bloomer

Oregon Supreme Court

Chan Hi v. Bloomer

93 P. 141, 50 Or. 560, 1907 Ore. LEXIS 226

Oregon Supreme Court·Decided December 17, 1907·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Commissioner King.

This is an action at' law by plaintiff for the recovery of a balance of $1,350, alleged to be due him from defendant on a contract for labor. The bill of exceptions discloses the same questions to be involved here, as urged .in Sutherlin v. Bloomer (decided on this date), 50 Or. 398 (93 Pac. 135), except as to the third error therein assigned.

That casq having determined the points here involved adversely to defendant's contention, it follows that the judgment of the circuit court in this action must be affirmed. .

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mr. Commissioner King.

This is an action at' law by plaintiff for the recovery of a balance of $1,350, alleged to be due him from defendant on a contract for labor. The bill of exceptions discloses the same questions to be involved here, as urged .in Sutherlin v. Bloomer (decided on this date), 50 Or. 398 (93 Pac. 135), except as to the third error therein assigned.

That casq having determined the points here involved adversely to defendant's contention, it follows that the judgment of the circuit court in this action must be affirmed. .

Affirmed.

Chan Hi v. Bloomer, 93 P. 141, 50 Or. 560, 1907 Ore. LEXIS 226 (Or. 1907).

Pincite

93 P. 141 (Chan Hi v. Bloomer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related