Champouillon v. Champouillon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Champouillon v. Champouillon

277 A.D.2d 890

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 19, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 890 (Champouillon v. Champouillon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Champouillon v. Champouillon, 277 A.D.2d 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action for separation, order granting defendant’s motion for reargument of plaintiff’s motion for alimony and counsel fee, and, upon such reargument, [891]*891adhering to the original determination, which awarded plaintiff $25 per week as alimony and $200 as counsel fee, modified by striking therefrom the words “ the original decision is adhered to ” and by substituting in lieu thereof, the following: “the plaintiff’s motion is denied in all respects.” As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. The record discloses that the wife’s present income is $52.50 per week; her husband’s $60, out of which he has been paying her $14 per week by direction of the Domestic Relations Court. It further appears that she has withdrawn the family savings of- $1,100 from the savings bank. Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action for separation, order granting defendant’s motion for reargument of plaintiff’s motion for alimony and counsel fee, and, upon such reargument, [891]*891adhering to the original determination, which awarded plaintiff $25 per week as alimony and $200 as counsel fee, modified by striking therefrom the words “ the original decision is adhered to ” and by substituting in lieu thereof, the following: “the plaintiff’s motion is denied in all respects.” As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. The record discloses that the wife’s present income is $52.50 per week; her husband’s $60, out of which he has been paying her $14 per week by direction of the Domestic Relations Court. It further appears that she has withdrawn the family savings of- $1,100 from the savings bank. Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/champouillon-v-champouillon-nyappdiv-1950.