Champlin v. Tilley
This text of 3 Day 303 (Champlin v. Tilley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The book must go to the jury, as it has been proved, and indeed conceded, that James Tilley made a few entries in it. The jury are to decide Whether the book, as it is, amounts to any proof of partnership.
The jury found a verdict for the defendant.
His counsel then moved, that judgment should be entered up for both defendants, though one of them had been defaulted.
The Court said, this was the correct mode of pro-seeding; for if the jury had found, that one defendant assumed and promised, and the other did not. iudsr- . , , ,. , ’ J b ment must have been entered up for both, the declaration being iounded on a joint promise only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Day 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/champlin-v-tilley-circtdct-1809.