Champlin v. Petrie

4 Wend. 209
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1830·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

The defendant is entitled to the effect of his motion. To compel him to notice the [210]*210cause for a hearing, and thus put the plaintiff out of court, would deprive him of the remedy given by the Revised Statutes (vol. 2, p. 620, § 2.) He has a right to stay the plaintiff's proceedings until security for costs be given ; and if the plaintiff neglects to comply with the order made for that purpose, the defendant is not bound to incur any further costs by noticing the cause for a hearing, but may apply to this court for judgment as in case of nonsuit, which is accordingly granted unless the plaintiff within 20 days file security for costs and notice the cause for hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Champlin v. Petrie, 4 Wend. 209 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1830).

4 Wend. 209 (Champlin v. Petrie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hinds v. Douglass
19 Abb. Pr. 11 (New York Supreme Court, 1865)
Price v. Betts
6 Paige Ch. 44 (New York Court of Chancery, 1836)
Ex parte Sheldon v. Erie C. P.
12 Wend. 268 (New York Supreme Court, 1835)