Champion Window Corp. v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Champion Window Corp. v. New York City Housing Authority

299 A.D.2d 204, 749 N.Y.S.2d 137, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10789

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 14, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 299 A.D.2d 204 (Champion Window Corp. v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Champion Window Corp. v. New York City Housing Authority, 299 A.D.2d 204, 749 N.Y.S.2d 137, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10789 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered May 23, 2002, which denied the motion of defendant New York City Housing Authority for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and the cross motion of plaintiff Champion Window Corp. for summary judgment on its first cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Contrary to Champion’s averments, the contract at issue [205]*205clearly provided for the substitution of materials at the Housing Authority’s discretion, and an adjustment in price was permitted. Thus, Champion’s cross motion was properly denied.

The Housing Authority’s motion for summary judgment was also properly denied, since the calculations made by the Housing Authority present factual issues which should be resolved at trial. Concur — Williams, P.J., Nardelli, Tom and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered May 23, 2002, which denied the motion of defendant New York City Housing Authority for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and the cross motion of plaintiff Champion Window Corp. for summary judgment on its first cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Contrary to Champion’s averments, the contract at issue [205]*205clearly provided for the substitution of materials at the Housing Authority’s discretion, and an adjustment in price was permitted. Thus, Champion’s cross motion was properly denied.

The Housing Authority’s motion for summary judgment was also properly denied, since the calculations made by the Housing Authority present factual issues which should be resolved at trial. Concur — Williams, P.J., Nardelli, Tom and Lerner, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

299 A.D.2d 204, 749 N.Y.S.2d 137, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/champion-window-corp-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-2002.