Champion v. Zuilkowski

182 So. 3d 689, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18487, 2015 WL 8483830
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 11, 2015
DocketNo. 5D15-676
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 182 So. 3d 689 (Champion v. Zuilkowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Champion v. Zuilkowski, 182 So. 3d 689, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18487, 2015 WL 8483830 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Matthew Champion appeals, pro se, from an order summarily denying his motion to dissolve a permanent injunction against domestic violence. His former girlfriend, Emma Ziulkowski,1 did not file an answer brief, because Champion sufficiently alleged changed circumstances, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing upon proper service of process on Ziulkowski. See Baker v. Pucket, 139 So.3d 954, 956 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

LAWSON, C.J., COHEN and ' BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Larry Jamison v. Chauntrell Knox
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 So. 3d 689, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18487, 2015 WL 8483830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/champion-v-zuilkowski-fladistctapp-2015.