Champion v. Champion

525 So. 2d 999, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1273, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2171, 1988 WL 51628
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 26, 1988·No. No. 87-1491·Published

Opinion

SHARP, Chief Judge.

Corinne Champion, the former wife, appeals from the dismissal of her motion to set aside the final judgment of dissolution against her former husband, George Champion, pursuant to rule 1.540(b) because of extrinsic fraud. The final judgment was rendered in 1981 and Corinne’s motion for relief was filed in 1986. We affirm.

Rule 1.540(b) limits to one year the time in which a party adversely affected by a judgment may bring a motion seeking relief based on extrinsic or intrinsic fraud. However, the rule states there is no time limit within which a party may bring an independent action for relief of “fraud on the court.” (Rule 1.540(b)). This has been interpreted to permit both motions based on intrinsic or extrinsic fraud within one year under rule 1.540(b), and independent suits after more than one year when based on extrinsic fraud. See DeClaire v. Yohanan, 453 So.2d 375, 380 (Fla.1984); Streater v. Stamper, 466 So.2d 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Here the motion pursuant to rule 1.540(b) was not timely filed.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER and DANIEL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Champion v. Champion, 525 So. 2d 999, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1273, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2171, 1988 WL 51628 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

525 So. 2d 999 (Champion v. Champion) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Streater v. Stamper
466 So. 2d 397 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
DeClaire v. Yohanan
453 So. 2d 375 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)