Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Gyromat Corp.
This text of 636 F.2d 907 (Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Gyromat Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm on the memorandum opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Warren W. Eginton, Judge, 88 F.R.D. 526 (D.Conn.1980), declining to grant under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 or 60(b)(2) a motion to reopen the trial proceedings on the basis of newly discovered evidence, filed following remand after Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Gyromat Corp., 603 F.2d 361 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 916, 100 S.Ct. 1276, 63 L.Ed.2d 600 (1980).
Appellee’s request for double costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1912 and Fed.R.App.P. 38 is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
636 F.2d 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/champion-spark-plug-co-v-gyromat-corp-ca2-1981.