Champion Paper & Fibre Co. v. Lee

216 N.C. 244
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 27, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 216 N.C. 244 (Champion Paper & Fibre Co. v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Champion Paper & Fibre Co. v. Lee, 216 N.C. 244 (N.C. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendants contend that a compulsory reference cannot be ordered until their alleged plea in bar has been determined. If it be conceded that the statute relating to the ripening of title by seven years adverse possession under color of title may be invoked as a plea in bar, there is still a complicated question of boundary within the meaning of the statute, C. S., 573 (3), presented on the pleadings in this case. The plea presents it.

The defendants rely upon Duckworth v. Duckworth, 144 N. C., 620, 57 S. E., 396. The decision there is clearly distinguishable by reason of different factual situation. Here, in any event, there is a complicated boundary dispute.

The judgment below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sledge v. Miller
106 S.E.2d 868 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 N.C. 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/champion-paper-fibre-co-v-lee-nc-1939.