Champion Manufacturing Co. v. Crandall & Co.
This text of 85 S.E. 673 (Champion Manufacturing Co. v. Crandall & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Previous negotiations are merged in a subsequent written contract, and additional obligations can not be grafted thereon by parol testimony, unless made subsequently to the contract and upon a valuable consideration. Smith v. Newton, 59 Ga. 113. The trial judge did not [537]*537err in his ruling upon the admissibility of evidence, nor in his remarks complained of in the fourth ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, nor in his charge in reference to the clearly opinionative statements, alleged to have been made by the plaintiff, as to the probable volume of sales of the defendant’s patented device. Terhune v. Coker, 107 Ga. 352 (33 S. E. 394); Dortic v. Dugas, 55 Ga. 484, 495; Angier v. Equitable Association, 109 Ga. 625 (3), 627 (35 S. E. 64); Baldwin v. Daniel, 69 Ga. 782.
2. The evidence fully authorized the verdict; no error of law appears, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 S.E. 673, 16 Ga. App. 536, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/champion-manufacturing-co-v-crandall-co-gactapp-1915.