Champenois v. White
1 Wend. 92
Opinion
By the Court,
There was no irregularity in this case. The return of nulla bona was a true return; there were no goods to satisfy the execution issued in this cause. The motion is denied with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Champenois v. White, 1 Wend. 92 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).
1 Wend. 92 (Champenois v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Beardsley v. . N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.
56 N.E. 483 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
Beardsley v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad
162 N.Y. 230 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
Eleventh Ward Bank v. Heather
22 Misc. 87 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Waterman v. Merrill
33 N.J.L. 378 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1869)
The People v. . Ames
35 N.Y. 482 (New York Court of Appeals, 1866)
Rogers v. Dickey
6 Ill. 636 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1844)
Evans v. Parker
20 Wend. 622 (New York Supreme Court, 1838)
Honeywell v. Burns
8 Cow. 121 (New York Supreme Court, 1828)