ChamPale Adams v. Richard Tauizon
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-11-00574-CV
ChamPale ADAMS, Appellant
v.
Richard TAUIZON, Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 9, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 370658 Honorable Walden Shelton, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 14, 2012
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
Appellant’s brief was due on January 30, 2012. Neither the brief nor a motion for
extension of time was filed. We, therefore, ordered Appellant ChamPale Adams to file, on or
before February 27, 2012, appellant’s brief and a written response reasonably explaining (1) the
failure to timely file the brief and (2) why appellee was not significantly injured by the failure to
timely file a brief. We warned that if Appellant ChamPale Adams failed to file a brief and the
written response by the date ordered, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See 04-11-00574-CV
TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if
appellant has failed to comply with a court order). Appellant ChamPale Adams has failed to
respond to our order. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. Costs of appeal
are taxed against Appellant ChamPale Adams.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ChamPale Adams v. Richard Tauizon (ChamPale Adams v. Richard Tauizon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.