ChamPale Adams v. Richard Tauizon

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 14, 2012·No. 04-11-00574-CV·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-11-00574-CV

ChamPale ADAMS, Appellant

v.

Richard TAUIZON, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 9, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 370658 Honorable Walden Shelton, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 14, 2012

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant’s brief was due on January 30, 2012. Neither the brief nor a motion for

extension of time was filed. We, therefore, ordered Appellant ChamPale Adams to file, on or

before February 27, 2012, appellant’s brief and a written response reasonably explaining (1) the

failure to timely file the brief and (2) why appellee was not significantly injured by the failure to

timely file a brief. We warned that if Appellant ChamPale Adams failed to file a brief and the

written response by the date ordered, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See 04-11-00574-CV

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if

appellant has failed to comply with a court order). Appellant ChamPale Adams has failed to

respond to our order. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. Costs of appeal

are taxed against Appellant ChamPale Adams.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ChamPale Adams v. Richard Tauizon, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

ChamPale Adams v. Richard Tauizon (ChamPale Adams v. Richard Tauizon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.