Champagne v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Champagne v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance

171 So. 2d 668, 247 La. 418

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 26, 1965

DocketNo. 47637

StatusPublished

This text of 171 So. 2d 668 (Champagne v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Champagne v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance, 171 So. 2d 668, 247 La. 418 (La. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company and Joseph and Dominic Giardina applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. Charles. 170 So.2d 226, 234, 237.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law.

HAMITER, J., is of the opinion that the writs should be granted but limited to a consideration of the question of quantum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company and Joseph and Dominic Giardina applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. Charles. 170 So.2d 226, 234, 237.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law.

HAMITER, J., is of the opinion that the writs should be granted but limited to a consideration of the question of quantum.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 So. 2d 668, 247 La. 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/champagne-v-southern-farm-bureau-casualty-insurance-la-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack