Champagne v. McDonald
277 So. 2d 234, 1973 La. App. LEXIS 6249
Opinion
On joint motion of Curtis K. Stafford, Jr., attorney for appellant and Roy Maugh-an, attorney for appellee and upon suggestion to the court that the parties desire to dismiss the captioned matter with prejudice at appellant’s cost.
It is ordered by the court that the above captioned matter be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice at appellant’s cost.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Champagne v. McDonald, 277 So. 2d 234, 1973 La. App. LEXIS 6249 (La. Ct. App. 1973).
277 So. 2d 234 (Champagne v. McDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Duhon v. COLONIAL LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO.
277 So. 2d 234 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1973)