Champagne v. Celotex Corp.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Champagne v. Celotex Corp.

565 So. 2d 425, 1990 La. LEXIS 1678, 1990 WL 91385

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Champagne v. Celotex Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 La. LEXIS 1816 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 29, 1990·No. No. 90-CC-1122·Published

Opinions

In re GAF Corporation; Keene Corporation; Quigley Company Inc.; — Defen[426]*426dant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 87-6174; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA90-0393.

Granted. Ruling of trial judge granting the motion to quash is reversed. La.Code Civ.P. art. 1464 is not applicable. Trial judge shall issue a protective order to insure the integrity of the specimens.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re GAF Corporation; Keene Corporation; Quigley Company Inc.; — Defen[426]*426dant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 87-6174; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA90-0393.

Granted. Ruling of trial judge granting the motion to quash is reversed. La.Code Civ.P. art. 1464 is not applicable. Trial judge shall issue a protective order to insure the integrity of the specimens.

Champagne v. Celotex Corp., 565 So. 2d 425, 1990 La. LEXIS 1678, 1990 WL 91385 (La. 1990).

Pincite

565 So. 2d 425 (Champagne v. Celotex Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.