Champagne v. Celotex Corp.

565 So. 2d 425, 1990 La. LEXIS 1678, 1990 WL 91385
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 29, 1990
DocketNo. 90-CC-1122
StatusPublished

This text of 565 So. 2d 425 (Champagne v. Celotex Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Champagne v. Celotex Corp., 565 So. 2d 425, 1990 La. LEXIS 1678, 1990 WL 91385 (La. 1990).

Opinions

In re GAF Corporation; Keene Corporation; Quigley Company Inc.; — Defen[426]*426dant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 87-6174; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA90-0393.

Granted. Ruling of trial judge granting the motion to quash is reversed. La.Code Civ.P. art. 1464 is not applicable. Trial judge shall issue a protective order to insure the integrity of the specimens.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
565 So. 2d 425, 1990 La. LEXIS 1678, 1990 WL 91385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/champagne-v-celotex-corp-la-1990.