Champ v. Kendrick

30 N.E. 635, 130 Ind. 545, 1892 Ind. LEXIS 379
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided March 10, 1892·No. No. 15,542·Published·Cited by 30 cases

Opinion

Miller, J.

This was an action to quiet the title to real «state brought by the appellee against the appellants and Milton Shirk.

[546] - The defendants, other than Shirk, demurred to the complaint. Their demurrers were overruled, and final judgment rendered against them on demurrer, quieting the title of the real estate described in the complaint.

This appeal was brought to reverse this judgment.

The finding of the court is, that the plaintiff “ have judgment against the defendants, other than the defendant Milton Shirk, and this cause is continued on defendant Shirk’s cross-complaint.”

The judgment rendered upon this finding concludes with this statement: “And this cause is continued on cross-complaint of defendant Milton Shirk.”

Appeals, except in a few specified instances, will only lie to this court'from final judgments. Section 632, R. S. 1881.

A judgment is not final unless all the issues of law and fact are determined, and the case completely disposed of, so far as the court had power to dispose of it. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Locke, 107 Ind. 9.

In that case this language from Freeman on Judgments is quoted with approval.

“ The policy of the laws of the several States and of the United States, is to prevent unnecessary appeals. The appellate courts will not review cases by piecemeal.”

There is no final judgment in favor of the plaintiff where one of the defendants is not mentioned in the judgment. A judgment to be final must dispose of the case as to all of the parties, and finally dispose of the subject-matter of the litigation. Masterson v. Williams (Texas), 11 S. W. R. 531; Mignon v. Brinson, 74 Tex. 18; Schultz v. McLean, 76 Cal. 608; Watkins v. Mason, 11 Ore. 72; State, ex rel., v. Temptin, 122 Ind. 235.

If the judgment is not final, this court is without jurisdiction. Wingo v. State, 99 Ind. 343; Mignon v. Brinson, supra.

Even the consent of parties can not give this court jurisdiction where the judgment appealed from is not a final [547] judgment. Shroyer v. Lawrence, 9 Ind. 322; Davis v. Davis, 36 Ind. 160; Wingo v. State, supra; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Locke, supra.

Filed March 10, 1892.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Champ v. Kendrick, 30 N.E. 635, 130 Ind. 545, 1892 Ind. LEXIS 379 (Ind. 1892).

30 N.E. 635 (Champ v. Kendrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoffman v. Schroeder
175 N.E.2d 139 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1961)
Desho v. State
145 N.E.2d 429 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1957)
The Celina Mutual Casualty Co. v. Baldridge
10 N.E.2d 904 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1937)
Attorney General of Utah v. Pomeroy
73 P.2d 1277 (Utah Supreme Court, 1937)
Shurtz v. Thorley
61 P.2d 1262 (Utah Supreme Court, 1936)
Breuninger v. Weck
189 N.E. 395 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1934)
Enmeier v. Blaize
179 N.E. 783 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1932)
Gray v. Gray
176 N.E. 105 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1931)
Wisconsin Lumber & Coal Co. v. Wall
151 N.E. 830 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1926)
Wayne Sewer & Drain Co. v. Ward Cowen Constraction Co.
125 N.E. 64 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1919)
Foote v. Foote
102 N.E. 393 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1913)
Hopp v. Luken
89 N.E. 916 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1909)
Mak-Saw-Ba Club v. Coffin
82 N.E. 461 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1907)
State, ex rel. Shenk v. Lung
80 N.E. 541 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1907)
Neyens v. Flesher
79 N.E. 1087 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1907)
Starkey v. Starkey
76 N.E. 876 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1906)
Hart v. Hildebrandt
66 N.E. 173 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1903)
Miller v. Bowers
65 N.E. 559 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1902)