Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Chamlee v. Austin

Chamlee v. Austin

103 S.E. 490, 150 Ga. 279, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 139
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 16, 1920
DocketNo. 1714
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 103 S.E. 490 (Chamlee v. Austin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chamlee v. Austin, 103 S.E. 490, 150 Ga. 279, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 139 (Ga. 1920).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

The court did not err in granting the interlocutory injunction. Civil Code, § 4252; Holcomb v. Cable Co., 119 Ga. 466 (46 S. E. 671.) Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Robert N. Ilardeman and Hardeman, Jones, Parle & Johnston, for plaintiff in error. Little Powell, Smith & Goldstein and Prank A. Hooper & Son, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Jackson
175 S.E. 409 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Security Mortgage Co. v. Powers
278 U.S. 149 (Supreme Court, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 490, 150 Ga. 279, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chamlee-v-austin-ga-1920.