Chambliss v. University Group Medical Associates
This text of 68 N.E.3d 84 (Chambliss v. University Group Medical Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against defendants South Island Medical Associates and Dr. Mark Joseph, dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]), as the prior motion for leave to appeal made at the Appellate Division was untimely as to them (see Arthur Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 12:3 at 436-437 [3d ed rev 2005]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against defendants University Group Medical Associates and Dr. Steven Siegel, dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 N.E.3d 84, 28 N.Y.3d 1097, 45 N.Y.S.3d 357, 2016 NY Slip Op 94755, 2016 WL 7364658, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 3821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chambliss-v-university-group-medical-associates-ny-2016.