Chambliss v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Chambliss v. State

116 So. 3d 615, 2013 WL 3237252, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10298

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 28, 2013·No. No. 5D12-4112·Published

Opinion

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The State concedes it was error to adjudicate the defendant, Amanda Renee Chambliss, in violation of probation for count three (DUI) because her probationary period on that count had expired before any steps were taken to revoke her probation. We therefore reverse the order adjudicating her in violation for count three and remand this case to the trial court with directions to discharge Cham-bliss on that count only. We affirm the violation of probation order as to count two, which involved the offense of driving with a suspended license causing death or serious injury.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

ORFINGER, C.J. SAWAYA J., and JACOBUS, senior judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The State concedes it was error to adjudicate the defendant, Amanda Renee Chambliss, in violation of probation for count three (DUI) because her probationary period on that count had expired before any steps were taken to revoke her probation. We therefore reverse the order adjudicating her in violation for count three and remand this case to the trial court with directions to discharge Cham-bliss on that count only. We affirm the violation of probation order as to count two, which involved the offense of driving with a suspended license causing death or serious injury.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

ORFINGER, C.J. SAWAYA J., and JACOBUS, senior judge, concur.

Chambliss v. State, 116 So. 3d 615, 2013 WL 3237252, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10298 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

116 So. 3d 615 (Chambliss v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.