Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Chambliss v. State

Chambliss v. State

911 So. 2d 1250, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14802, 2005 WL 2292322
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 21, 2005·No. No. 4D05-3251·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing a motion that includes the oath required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(c) within the time remaining under rule 3.850(b).

STEVENSON, C.J., WARNER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chambliss v. State, 911 So. 2d 1250, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14802, 2005 WL 2292322 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

911 So. 2d 1250 (Chambliss v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.