Chambliss v. Felder
This text of 156 S.E.2d 374 (Chambliss v. Felder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this automobile death case, the trial court did not err in refusing the plaintiff’s motion for new trial on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to law, the evidence, and the weight of the evidence, since the evidence supported the verdict for the defendant. The evidence did not demand a finding that the defendant could have seen and avoided hitting the plaintiff’s two-year-old child.
Judgment affirmed. Since the judgment complained of in the main appeal is affirmed, it is unnecessary to pass on the cross appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 S.E.2d 374, 116 Ga. App. 80, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chambliss-v-felder-gactapp-1967.