Chambliss v. Chandler

108 S.E. 166, 27 Ga. App. 304, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 850
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 26, 1921
Docket12521
StatusPublished

This text of 108 S.E. 166 (Chambliss v. Chandler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chambliss v. Chandler, 108 S.E. 166, 27 Ga. App. 304, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 850 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

This being the first grant of a new trial, and the verdict not having been demanded by the law and the evidence, the discretion of the judge in granting another trial will not be controlled.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 S.E. 166, 27 Ga. App. 304, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chambliss-v-chandler-gactapp-1921.