Chambless v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Chambless v. State

109 P. 1113, 4 Okla. Crim. 47, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 26

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 27, 1910

DocketNo. A-296.

StatusPublished

This text of 109 P. 1113 (Chambless v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chambless v. State, 109 P. 1113, 4 Okla. Crim. 47, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 26 (Okla. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CITBIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Choctaw county for the crime of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors, and was sentenced to be confined for a period of 30 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $50. The judgment and sentence was entered on April 28, 1909. An appeal was taken by filing in this court a case-made without a petition in error. No petition in error or briefs have ever been filed, and we .are not advised of what plaintiff in error complains of or relies upon for reversal. Counsel for the state on March 26, 1910, filed a motion for affirmance for want of prosecution. We have examined the information, instructions of the court, and the judgment and sentence, and we have discovered no error which will warrant a reversal of the ease. The motion to affirm is therefore *48 (sustained, and the judgment of the county court of Choctaw county is in all things affirmed, and the cause remanded, with direction to enforce the judgment and sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CITBIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Choctaw county for the crime of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors, and was sentenced to be confined for a period of 30 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $50. The judgment and sentence was entered on April 28, 1909. An appeal was taken by filing in this court a case-made without a petition in error. No petition in error or briefs have ever been filed, and we .are not advised of what plaintiff in error complains of or relies upon for reversal. Counsel for the state on March 26, 1910, filed a motion for affirmance for want of prosecution. We have examined the information, instructions of the court, and the judgment and sentence, and we have discovered no error which will warrant a reversal of the ease. The motion to affirm is therefore *48 (sustained, and the judgment of the county court of Choctaw county is in all things affirmed, and the cause remanded, with direction to enforce the judgment and sentence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 P. 1113, 4 Okla. Crim. 47, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chambless-v-state-oklacrimapp-1910.