Chambers v. Walker

106 S.E. 811, 26 Ga. App. 586, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 537
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 13, 1921·No. 11903·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

It is recited in the bill of exceptions in this case that by agreement of counsel the issues upon two separate cases between the same parties were tried together before one jury. The record shows there were two separate verdicts. The plaintiff in error filed only one motion for a new trial, in which complaint is made as to the admissibility of evidence, and certain errors are assigned upon excerpts from the charge of the court. The plaintiff in error undertakes to have both cases considered on one motion for a new trial, and presents only one bill of exceptions, to bring, into question the legality of the two verdicts in the two separate cases. Under the ruling of this court in Jones v. Maril, 19 Ga. App. 216(4) (91 S. E. 445), and cases there cited, this writ of error must be dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Attachment, ■ etc.; from Haralson superior court — Judge Irwin. July 8, 1920. Lloyd Thomas, M. J. Head, for plaintiff in error. Price Edwards, J. 8. Edwards, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chambers v. Walker, 106 S.E. 811, 26 Ga. App. 586, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 537 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

106 S.E. 811 (Chambers v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dempsey v. State
119 S.E.2d 298 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Continental Wrecking Co. v. City of East Point
57 S.E.2d 699 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Williams v. Smith
17 S.E.2d 206 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Lowery v. Wilcox
174 S.E. 149 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Askew v. Powell
117 S.E. 769 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Fillingame v. State
109 S.E. 916 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)