Chambers v. United States

47 F.3d 1015, 1995 WL 67598
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 21, 1995·No. Nos. 93-55780, 93-56031·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The United States’ motion to vacate judgment, withdraw opinion, and summarily affirm the district court’s judgments is granted in part and denied in part. The government’s request to vacate judgment is granted; the remaining requests are denied.

The opinion in this case is vacated (22 F.3d 939 (9th Cir.1994)). The ease is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc., — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 464, 130 L.Ed.2d 372 (1994). The district court shall determine whether review of the adequacy of the indictment is open to Chambers, and if so, whether the indictment in this matter was defective regarding allegations of scienter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chambers v. United States, 47 F.3d 1015, 1995 WL 67598 (9th Cir. 1995).

47 F.3d 1015 (Chambers v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Personal Restraint Petition of Neil Allen Alway
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2026
State v. Whitehorn
2002 MT 54 (Montana Supreme Court, 2002)
Fink v. Montes
44 F. Supp. 2d 1052 (C.D. California, 1999)
United States v. Turner
914 F. Supp. 48 (W.D. New York, 1996)
Abreu v. United States
911 F. Supp. 203 (E.D. Virginia, 1996)
Oliver v. United States
901 F. Supp. 1262 (W.D. Michigan, 1995)