Chambers v. United States
This text of 47 F.3d 1015 (Chambers v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The United States’ motion to vacate judgment, withdraw opinion, and summarily affirm the district court’s judgments is granted in part and denied in part. The government’s request to vacate judgment is granted; the remaining requests are denied.
The opinion in this case is vacated (22 F.3d 939 (9th Cir.1994)). The ease is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc., — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 464, 130 L.Ed.2d 372 (1994). The district court shall determine whether review of the adequacy of the indictment is open to Chambers, and if so, whether the indictment in this matter was defective regarding allegations of scienter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 F.3d 1015, 1995 WL 67598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chambers-v-united-states-ca9-1995.