Chambers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Chambers v. State

351 So. 2d 1135, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16923

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chambers v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 388 So. 2d 1259 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 18, 1977·No. No. 77-91·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. The judgment and sentence of the court while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1) Florida Statutes. Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla.2d DCA 1975).

[1136]*1136Remanded for correction of the sentence; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

GRIMES, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and RYDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. The judgment and sentence of the court while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1) Florida Statutes. Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla.2d DCA 1975).

[1136]*1136Remanded for correction of the sentence; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

GRIMES, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and RYDER, JJ., concur.

Chambers v. State, 351 So. 2d 1135, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16923 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

351 So. 2d 1135 (Chambers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related