Chambers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Chambers v. State

176 So. 2d 597, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4317

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 30, 1965

DocketNo. 64-1016

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 176 So. 2d 597 (Chambers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chambers v. State, 176 So. 2d 597, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4317 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Melvin Chambers, the defendant below, appeals a judgment of conviction of the crimes of grand larceny and breaking and entering with intent to commit grand larceny. The cause was tried without a jury. By the testimony of one of the participants the occurrence, and the appellant’s part therein were established. Reversal is sought on contentions that the search warrant was Invalid, that certain evidence was improperly admitted, and a claim of insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction.

Certain material issues relating to validity of the search warrant and as to the amount of money taken required the judge as trier of the facts, in the due performance of his duty and prerogatives, to resolve conflicts in the evidence and to pass upon questions of credibility of witnesses. The record furnishes adequate support for the decision reached, and no harmful error has been made to appear. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Melvin Chambers, the defendant below, appeals a judgment of conviction of the crimes of grand larceny and breaking and entering with intent to commit grand larceny. The cause was tried without a jury. By the testimony of one of the participants the occurrence, and the appellant’s part therein were established. Reversal is sought on contentions that the search warrant was Invalid, that certain evidence was improperly admitted, and a claim of insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction.

Certain material issues relating to validity of the search warrant and as to the amount of money taken required the judge as trier of the facts, in the due performance of his duty and prerogatives, to resolve conflicts in the evidence and to pass upon questions of credibility of witnesses. The record furnishes adequate support for the decision reached, and no harmful error has been made to appear. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 So. 2d 597, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chambers-v-state-fladistctapp-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack