Chambers v. State
This text of Chambers v. State (Chambers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
MICHAEL D. CHAMBERS, § § Defendant Below, § No. 5, 2021 Appellant, § § Court Below—Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 0311009491A (N) § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: June 7, 2021 Decided: June 28, 2021
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Justices.
ORDER
After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the appellee’s
motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below
should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court’s order, dated December 7,
2020, denying the appellant’s sixth motion for postconviction relief. The appellant
did not plead with particularity new evidence of actual innocence or that a new,
retroactive rule of constitutional law rendered his convictions invalid.1 Nor did he
assert any claim that the Superior Court lacked jurisdiction.2
1 Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(d)(2). 2 Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(i)(5). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is
GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chambers v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chambers-v-state-del-2021.