Chambers v. Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Chambers v. Smith

38 A. 522, 183 Pa. 122, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 723

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 25, 1897·No. Appeal, No. 36·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiám,

The only question presented by the assignments of error is: Whether the court erred in entering judgment against the defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense?

We find nothing in the record that would have warranted the court in sending the case to.a jury. On the contrary, its action in sustaining the motion for judgment is amply vindicated in the opinion sent up with tire record; and on that opinion, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiám,

The only question presented by the assignments of error is: Whether the court erred in entering judgment against the defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense?

We find nothing in the record that would have warranted the court in sending the case to.a jury. On the contrary, its action in sustaining the motion for judgment is amply vindicated in the opinion sent up with tire record; and on that opinion, the judgment is affirmed.

Chambers v. Smith, 38 A. 522, 183 Pa. 122, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 723 (Pa. 1897).

Pincite

38 A. 522 (Chambers v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related