Chambers v. N.C. Dept. Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention

Fourth Circuit

Chambers v. N.C. Dept. Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention

564 F. App'x 699

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 2, 2014

DocketNo. 13-2299

StatusPublished

This text of 564 F. App'x 699 (Chambers v. N.C. Dept. Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chambers v. N.C. Dept. Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention, 564 F. App'x 699 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tony E. Chambers appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendant in Chambers’ employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chambers v. N.C. Dep’t of Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention, No. 1:10-cv-00315-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Sept. 27, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tony E. Chambers appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendant in Chambers’ employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chambers v. N.C. Dep’t of Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention, No. 1:10-cv-00315-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Sept. 27, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

564 F. App'x 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chambers-v-nc-dept-juvenile-justice-delinquency-prevention-ca4-2014.