Chambers v. Maxwell

107 So. 806, 214 Ala. 284, 1926 Ala. LEXIS 218
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided March 18, 1926·No. 6 Div. 623.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

GARDNER, J.

The only assignment of error here presented relates to the action of the court in overruling defendants’ motion for a new trial. The appeal is upon the record; there being no bill of exceptions. Under our previous decisions, that an exception was reserved to such action of the trial court must appear by bill of exceptions, or otherwise the same is not available to appellant. Ex parte Rials, 101 So. 630, 211 Ala. 615; Grand Bay Land Co. v. Simpson, 81 So. 548, 202 Ala. 606; Pówell v. Folmar, 78 So. 47, 201 Ala. 271; Akin v. Chancy Bros., 93 So. 408, 207 Ala. 523.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chambers v. Maxwell, 107 So. 806, 214 Ala. 284, 1926 Ala. LEXIS 218 (Ala. 1926).

107 So. 806 (Chambers v. Maxwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frost v. State
22 So. 2d 614 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1945)
Southern Ry. Co. v. Scottsboro Wholesale Co.
119 So. 241 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1928)
Phillips v. S. F. Bowser Co.
114 So. 786 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1927)
Thomas v. Carter
117 So. 634 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1927)