Chambers v. Kowalsky
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
CANDISS CHAMBERS, Case No. 22-10780 Plaintiff, F. Kay Behm Vv. United States District Judge ALYSA KOWALSKY, et al., Elizabeth A. Stafford United States Magistrate Judge Defendants. a OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S JUNE 5, 2023 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 42)
This case is before the court on Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford’s
June 5, 2023, Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 42). Judge Stafford
recommends a default be entered against Defendant Maven Properties, LLC. /d. The court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the
pleadings. Neither party has filed objections. “[T]he failure to object to the
magistrate judge’s report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal, 2012 WL 3639070 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). The court nevertheless agrees with Judge Stafford’s recommended disposition. It appears that, following the
death of her previous attorney, Defendant Kowalsky has been given numerous
warnings that failure to obtain counsel for Defendant Maven Properties would
result in an entry of default. Despite these warnings, Defendant Maven
Properties remains unrepresented. The court also notes that Defendant Kowalsky entered a notice of
suggestion of bankruptcy on July 15, 2023, informing the court that she has “filed
a Voluntary Petition for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy in the Eastern District of Michigan Bankruptcy Court.” (ECF No. 45, PagelD.487). As stated in her notice, the filing of
a bankruptcy petition in this court operates as an automatic stay of the
proceedings. 11 U.S.C. § 362(a). However, this stay applies only to the party directly involved in bankruptcy, which does not include Defendant Maven
Properties. See Lynch v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 710 F.2d 1194, 1196 (6th Cir. 1983); In re Johnson, 548 B.R. 770, 787 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2016) (“It is axiomatic
that § 362(a)(1) does not automatically give rise to a general stay of creditors’ rights to pursue nondebtor codefendant”). Likewise, for the reasons stated above, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 42) and enters a
DEFAULT against Defendant Maven Properties, LLC.
SO ORDERED.
Date: October 4, 2023 s/ F. Kay Behm F. Kay Behm United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chambers v. Kowalsky (Chambers v. Kowalsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.