Chambers v. I. Ben Greenman Ass'n

269 A.D. 938, 58 N.Y.S.2d 3
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 26, 1945·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The use of the signs on the same building as .shown by Exhibits A, B, C and D, together with the use of the word “ Democratic ” and the emblem of the regular Democratic Party in connection with them, in our opinion is improper as it would have a tendency to confuse the voters and create the impression that the names appearing upon the signs are the candidates of the regular Democratic organization. (Fay v. O’Connor, 169 Misc. 466, affd. 257 App. Div. 815, affd. 281 N. Y. 849.) The order, accordingly, should be affirmed.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon and Cohn, JJ., concur; Dore, J., taking no part.

Order unanimously affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chambers v. I. Ben Greenman Ass'n, 269 A.D. 938, 58 N.Y.S.2d 3 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

269 A.D. 938 (Chambers v. I. Ben Greenman Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shein v. Horatio Seymour Democratic Club, Inc.
44 Misc. 2d 729 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
Plonski v. Flynn
35 Misc. 2d 863 (New York County Courts, 1961)
In re Stillwell Political Club, Inc.
26 Misc. 2d 931 (New York Supreme Court, 1951)
Rich v. Storer
186 Misc. 87 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)