Chambers v. Dickson

Fayette Superior Court, Ga.

Chambers v. Dickson

1 Georgia Decisions 164

DecidedSeptember 15, 1842

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Georgia Decisions 164 (Chambers v. Dickson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Fayette Superior Court, Ga. primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chambers v. Dickson, 1 Georgia Decisions 164 (Ga. Super. Ct. 1842).

Pincite

Opinion

This certiorari was brought to correct certain errors alleged to have been committed in four cases tried in the Court below, wherein the present plaintiffs were defendants. The errors complained of were two; that the notes were given for the same consideration and due at the same time, and therefore exceeded the Justice’s jurisdiction, Second ; That there were no copies of the notes attached to the summonses served on defendants. The return shews that no such plea as that contained in the first ground was filed or insisted on in the Court below, and therefore constituted no ground of error. The second is admitted by the rgturn. But as there is no la%making it necdssary.that a copy of the note should be, attached to the summons, I do not consider the want of this a valid objection to the proceedings. It is therefore ordered, that the certiorari be dismissed, and the proceedings below confirmed.

WILLIAM EZZARD, j. s. c. c. c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This certiorari was brought to correct certain errors alleged to have been committed in four cases tried in the Court below, wherein the present plaintiffs were defendants. The errors complained of were two; that the notes were given for the same consideration and due at the same time, and therefore exceeded the Justice’s jurisdiction, Second ; That there were no copies of the notes attached to the summonses served on defendants. The return shews that no such plea as that contained in the first ground was filed or insisted on in the Court below, and therefore constituted no ground of error. The second is admitted by the rgturn. But as there is no la%making it necdssary.that a copy of the note should be, attached to the summons, I do not consider the want of this a valid objection to the proceedings. It is therefore ordered, that the certiorari be dismissed, and the proceedings below confirmed.

WILLIAM EZZARD, j. s. c. c. c.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Georgia Decisions 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chambers-v-dickson-gasuperctfay-1842.