Chambers v. Conard

Eighth Circuit

Chambers v. Conard

547 F. App'x 807

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 11, 2013

DocketNo. 13-3024

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 547 F. App'x 807 (Chambers v. Conard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chambers v. Conard, 547 F. App'x 807 (8th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Roscoe Chambers appeals the district [808]*808court’s¹ 28 U.S.C. § 1915A preservice dismissal of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Upon de novo review, see Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam) (standard of review), we conclude that Chambers failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) (complaint must state “more than an unadorned, the-defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation”; mere conclusory statements are insufficient to support claim). We therefore affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Roscoe Chambers appeals the district [808]*808court’s¹ 28 U.S.C. § 1915A preservice dismissal of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Upon de novo review, see Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam) (standard of review), we conclude that Chambers failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) (complaint must state “more than an unadorned, the-defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation”; mere conclusory statements are insufficient to support claim). We therefore affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

547 F. App'x 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chambers-v-conard-ca8-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack